Iran, another Grave-Yard for West

Following sanctions on Iran from USA and blaming it for 9/11 blast , pressured Iran to block the Harmuz oil route.  Around 97% of gulf oil passes through Harmuz and if that is blocked or threatened it will be treated as war ; said American officials.

American’s friends like Saudia, UAE  and OMAN are also worry if that block going to imposs by Iran.

Following days Iran has already started military drills in their own boundary but very close to international water. This was seen as an escalating step towards blockade.

Iran officials said that if West continously imposing sanctions , Iran will definately block this 97% oil route.

In the drill Iran uses its domestically built military weapon since it had sancations to buy military equipment from abroad.

watch the related videos here.

U.S. Debated Cyberwarfare in Attack Plan on Libya

U.S. Debated Cyberwarfare in Attack Plan on Libya

WASHINGTON — Just before the American-led strikes against Libya in March, the Obama administration intensely debated whether to open the mission with a new kind of warfare: a cyberoffensive to disrupt and even disable the Qaddafi government’s air-defense system, which threatened allied warplanes.

While the exact techniques under consideration remain classified, the goal would have been to break through the firewalls of the Libyan government’s computer networks to sever military communications links and prevent the early-warning radars from gathering information and relaying it to missile batteries aiming at NATO warplanes. Continue reading U.S. Debated Cyberwarfare in Attack Plan on Libya

Do you see your Child in her?

[singlepic id=68 w=420 h=340 float=center]

I did’nt born in this camp, I was the loving child of my parents like you and my parents loved me like you love your children but until 7th October 2001, when US started to bomb our homes and schools. I was also a student like your children but until it was destroyed by NATO forces.

Continue reading Do you see your Child in her?

Propaganda Unfold

 right-wing extremist who shot dead at least 85 people at a youth camp

Most probably you  have heard the explosion in Oslo on 22nd July 2011. Instantly news media were started to claim that it is alqaeeda’s work and this attitude is not a shock. Main stream media is always portrait what ever bad happened to Alqaeeda. This is it’s ill-tactics started from 9/11 than in London bombing , after that in Stockholm bombing and now in Oslo. 

right-wing extremist who shot dead at least 85 people

Despite all of their propaganda the voices backfold when right after 1 hour a Christian Norweign Fundamentalist massacred 85 people . Now Government sources claim that these both events are connected and due to a political agenda internal to Norway’s diplomacy. 

Media on other side now aplogizing and present the low tone that what they have try to allege in the explosion was indeed wrong. This is clearly a sign for us as a citizen not to blindly follow what present in main stream rather wait and use some gray-matter in head.  

The hypocrtical role of media in this case is of vital importance and a term-card for our future reliance on them as reliable sources. 



Another nail in our Privacy’s Coufin by US

— The 21st of May has come and gone, and I’m still here. Not even a minor ground shake in either of my Ring of Fire locations (in Silicon Valley & Southeast Asia).

But this no time for rapture. Last week, quietly, Members of Congress reached an agreement that continues the God-like powers given to the Federal government over how it can track people domestically, what information it can seize, and why. The nefarious Patriot Act—a piece of legislation that’s named about as accurately as Greenland—is going to be with us for at least four more years.

The USA Patriot Act, as it’s formally called, passed quickly in 2001 after 9/11. It grants extraordinary powers to the government, the kind often found in wartime, the kind that rank with Lincoln’s suspension of habeas corpus during the Civil War and Roosevelt’s internment camps of WWII.

Former Rep. Dick Armey—not a liberal fave or warm and fuzzy guy—did his best to build “sunset” provisions into the act when it first became law. He assumed that the US in all its might would have found Osama bin Laden and wrapped up this Al Qaeda nonsense by 2005, so set that year for the act’s expiration.

Armey’s idea didn’t fly, and the act has been with us all along. It was set to expire early this year. First it got extended for 90 days, and now it’s expected to be around until at least 2015.

I’ve Got Nothing to Hide
I often wonder if people who say “if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to worry about” are fascists or just foolish.

The idea that anyone can just start going through your stuff at any time, without telling you about it, then use anything that’s found to develop serious charges against you, valid or not, runs about as counter to what America is all about generally and what the Fourth Amendment is about particularly as anything imaginable.

Imagine the outcry if the United States government started shutting down newspapers and radio stations, or if agents suddenly showed up on everyone’s doorstep to confiscate their guns. Imagine if National Guard troops showed up at doors, demanding to be fed and housed. Imagine if you suddenly the courts said you had damn well better admit to a crime or face jail.

Those abuses would be rank violations of the First, Second, Third, and Fifth Amendments and would be shouted down immediately. Yet there seems to be little concern about the Patriot Act’s flagrant flouting of the Fourth.

Centrist Radicals
Indeed, this is a time in which the reasonable middle ground is leading the stampede. The Members of Congress who oppose it come from the edges of both parties. Two dozen Republicans opposed extending it previously, as did many Democrats.

But now, an agreement has apparently been reached by those normally viewed as moderates. The Obama Administration has been annoyingly coy about this legislation all along, apparently afraid to look soft on terrorism but also lacking the spine to admit it’s not so in love with civil liberties either.

Facebook, Beware!
The irony in this situation was reflected last week when Facebook came under attack for its approach to the privacy of its members. First revealed as the ogre behind a potentially ugly smear campaign against Google (aka the bear calling the moose brown), then accused of a stealth campaign against proposed privacy legislation in California, the increasingly friendless social networking monster was lambasted in Washington for its “indefensible” business practices…by a Rockefeller.

What’s next? A lecture on child protection by the Pope? A call for humility and reasonable hairstyles by Donald Trump?

What Facebook, Google, and the other big data attractors absolutely must understand is that their rigid refusal to stop collecting personal data by hook or crook plays right into the hands of Feds empowered by the Patriot Act. The government has and will work to “persuade” these companies to give up any and all information deemed worthy of the continuing war on terror.

Now that President Obama has enabled bin Laden to swim with the fishes, would it be that he embraced Dick Armey’s insight. Would it be that the moderate viewpoint in Washington wasn’t the one that J. Edgar Hoover and Mussolini would have loved.

Would it be that top management at Facebook understood that the real battle they face with the government is not about limits to what they can collect, but an absence of limits over what they may have to reveal.

Courtesy: Facebook, Beware! Fear the Patriot Act

Honeymoon on expense of people’s Blood squeezed taxes


Royal coat of arms of the United Kingdom.
Royal coat of arms of the United Kingdom.

Probably you have already burn your blood in anger when you noticed that couple of hundred Millions british pounds have been thrown into Royal wedding of Kate and William recently. Couple of Hundred Millions ? are you nuts … ? where does it comes ? Did “prince” William CEO of a multi national ? Oh Poor, Citizen they (Monarch) don’t have to wake up early and rush towards metro to bang the head for next 10-12 hours ..   We feed them, my dear. It was our Tax money.. [pullquote]Oh Poor, Citizen they (Monarch) don’t have to wake up early and rush towards metro to bang the head for next 10-12 hours[/pullquote]

But this in not only in U.K  rather In Sweden last year when “Princess” Victoria got married,  her father King Gustav of Sweden ordered Skatteverket (Swedish Tax agency) to throw around 6 Million Swedish Crowns..  Wow… that is too much , yes but it is ironic as well.

At that time let me share you how does we fit-in on this canvas.  The capitalism pyramid , where me and you are the bottom serving people.

IWW poster printed 1911
Image via Wikipedia

We do have rights to eat , sleep and sometime to speak against those which our masters want , but we are not allowed or never free our minds to speak against themselves.

Furthermore, now using our blood tax money Kate and William are on honey moon on the islands of the Seychelles. Which cost around 150 Million GBP but not to them , but for Us , the poor workers.

Don’t worry work hard , be focused on your job , earn money to feed your children but never ever try to think beyond this box .. otherwise , if you do ? You will be called Terrorist of the Elite centric System.



Double standards of France

Photo: Nikolai JakobsenWomen in burqas rounded up by French riot police, waiting to be transported to a police station.

PARIS. Now comes the French burqa ban. The wearing veil in public places face fines of 1400 dollars. Only a few thousand women are directly affected. But for French Muslims DN encounter is the ban still a way to identify them as foreigners in French society.

France; which declares to be a liberated country where “people” have freedom to dress and way of living is turn to be a “Double Standard”.  After implementing ban on Muslim’s dressing the French parliment is on the reverse gear of democracy .

Sonia (French born reverted to Islam from Atheist family) says she will not take off her burka when the ban comes into force:

– I still wear it when I go out, come what may.